As far as I remember the Back-end Size for Disk Storage table below there was the expression disk instead of location. Any concept changes?
URL:
Anyway, why would we need two locations instead of one? To expand managed capacity? In the same Storage Pool? Let's imagine a storage pool with 4 nodes. Here storage pool and grid are synonyms. Right? So, each node with two disks of 2 TB SSD Class Disk/PCIe IO Cards?
This two-disk (two-locations) configuration appears to suit the "Cross-site Replication Sample Configuration" scenario. A cross-site replication setup is when data from one site is backed up on location and a secondary copy of the backup is maintained on site two. Also, the site two has its own data backed up on location and a secondary copy of that data is maintained on site one.