Log4j Vulnerability - Please Post All Questions Here


Userlevel 7
Badge +23

Summary
 

The following thread describes the potential exposure to the Apache Log4j vulnerability and steps to update Commvault software.

It has been confirmed that a small subset of Commvault agents are impacted. 

 

Update as of 1st February: Maintenance Release to bring Log4j version to 2.17.1 across Commvault software platform has been released. This release includes the upgrade of components that previously used Log4j 1.x. 

 

Update as of 20th December: Maintenance Release including relevant hotfixes now available for Commvault software, see section “Maintenance Releases”. Please note customers who have already applied hotfixes for Log4j 2.16, do not need to install.

For customers with Commvault Hyperscale X and Distributed storage, please see section new Community article here: 

 

Apache Log4j information

  • CVE-2021-44228: Apache Log4j2 JNDI features do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default
  • CVE-2021-45046: Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. Log4j 2.16.0 fixes this issue by removing support for message lookup patterns and disabling JNDI functionality by default
  • CVE-2021-45105: Apache Log4j2 did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. 
  • CVE-2021-4104: JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data.

  • CVE-2021-44832: Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-beta7 through 2.17.0 (excluding security fix releases 2.3.2 and 2.12.4) are vulnerable to a remote code execution (RCE) attack where an attacker with permission to modify the logging configuration file can construct a malicious configuration using a JDBC Appender with a data source referencing a JNDI URI which can execute remote code.

Note: Log4j version 1.x is NOT affected.

There’s a great blog article that covers the potential impact.

 

Updates:

CVE-2021-45105: Commvault can confirm that the affected Log4j2 function is NOT leveraged by Commvault software and thus there is no immediate need to update Commvault to use Log4j 2.17. 

CVE-2021-4104: The Commvault software does not use the JMSAppender module and, therefore, the vulnerability about log4j 1.x versions does not affect any Commvault products.

CVE-2021-44832: The Commvault software does not use the JdbcAppender module and, therefore, the vulnerability about remote code execution attack does not affect any Commvault products.

 

Identifying and Updating Commvault

 

Exposure:

Note: check FAQ at the bottom of this post for specific version questions.

The exposure impacts the below Commvault product features:

Cloud Apps package
Oracle agent - Database archiving, data masking, and logical dump backup
Microsoft SQL Server agent - Database archiving, data masking, and table level restore

Commvault Distributed Storage

Commvault Hyperscale X

 

Identifying affected servers using the Commvault Log4j report

 

Please use the below direct link to download the Commvault Log4J Affected Servers report then follow step 4 to import and run

https://cloud.commvault.com/webconsole/softwarestore/store.do#!/135/663/21789  

 

Alternatively, follow steps 1-3 to manually download the Commvault report:

  1. Log into cloud.commvault.com and click the Software Store tile icon 
  2. Search the Store for Log4j and click the Download button for the “Log4J affected servers” report 
  3. Log into Command Center and navigate to Reports
  4. At the top right of the Reports page, click Actions and Import report. Proceed to select the downloaded report file to import into Command Center. 
  5. Now you can run the report.

This report will show you any servers with Cloud Apps, SQL Server, and Oracle Database packages installed that may be affected by Log4j vulnerability.
Note: If the resulting report shows No Data to Display, then there are no affected clients in this CommCell

The easiest course of action is to upgrade all servers listed in this report (Oracle, Cloud Apps, and SQL) – that would be the recommendation. However, at a minimum, servers with Database Archiving, Data Masking, or Extent based backups (SQL table level restore) features enabled should have highest priority as the vulnerable log4j package is actively used, while otherwise the packages are dormant.

 

Maintenance Releases

 

The table below outlines the specific Maintenance Releases that will both address Log4j 2.x vulnerabilities as well as update Log4j 1.x components to 2.17.1 (the latest release of Log4j)

Note: If the previous Log4j 2.16 hotfixes has already been applied, then this latest Maintenance Release is optional 

Feature Release

Maintenance Release

11.26

11.26.21

11.25

11.25.32

11.24

11.24.48

11.23

11.23.47

11.20

11.20.90

SP16

SP16.153

 

How to deploy Maintenance Release:

 

  1. First perform a disaster recovery backup using steps HERE .
  2. OPTIONAL: create a server group containing all the affected servers using instructions HERE.  This can make it easier to select servers for the upgrade process.
  3. Go to documentation to find the list of updates: https://documentation.commvault.com/11.24/essential/146231_security_vulnerability_and_reporting.html
  4. Download the maintenance pack for the version the CommServe is running on. 

    If you do not know the CommServe version, in Command Center search for About and click the About search result to bring up the version popup. 
  5. Extract the Maintenance Pack
  6. Follow instructions HERE to copy the software packages to the cache using Command Center.  
  7. Proceed to Install updates following instructions HERE .  You can update only the affected clients to avoid the CommServe services stopping, however it is recommended to update the CommServe and all affected servers as shown on the report for completeness.
  8. Once completed re-rerun the report to show that the servers have the appropriate fixes

Note: For instructions on how to apply Log4j 2.16 hotfixes on older Maintenance Release, please see FAQ

 

See Commvault Online Documentation for additional information:

https://documentation.commvault.com/11.25/essential/146231_security_vulnerability_and_reporting.html

 

HyperScale X and CDS (Hedvig)

 

For all detailed information on how to update HyperScale X and Commvault Distributed Storage (CDS) to address Log4j vulnerabilities, please see article here:

 

 

Log4j FAQ 

 

Q:   There is a new vulnerability in 2.15 is Commvault addressing this? 

A:   The LOG4J 2.15 version (GA Dec. 06, 2021) disabled the essential exploit functions by default was released last week on Dec 6, 2021. This was considered the market-acceptable, non-vulnerable upgrade package up to today.  

 The Apache organization released a new version, 2.16, on Monday, Dec.13, 2021, which physically removes the vulnerable functions. 

 This evening, the security groups issued a new vulnerability CVE-2021-45046 targeting concerns with the 2.15 version and recommending the shift to 2.16.   

  This significant change affects all client remediation methods, requiring an upgrade to version 2.16.  Log4j 2.16 hotfixes have now been released, please see table above

 

Q: When will new hotfixes be available for 2.16 log4j? 

A: Log4j 2.16 hotfixes have now been released, please see table above

 

Q:  I've noticed older 1.x versions of log4j being used in the platform.  Are these vulnerable? 

A:   We have some older instances in the installed component structure related to the older generation Log4J 1.x files which are not part of the current CVE Log4J 2.x vulnerability. We are doing further investigation on those conditions to determine a course of action.  

We do plan to remove all 1.x references in the Feb 1st maintenance release to prevent “false alarms”.  That version is not vulnerable to the current respective CVEs, but it would clear up the scanning concerns.

 

Q:  I noticed HyperScale 1.5 is using end of life versions of Log4j.  Is this being resolved? 

A:  The 1.x versions of log4j bundled with HyperScale 1.5 are maintained and supported by Redhat.  These versions are not affected by this CVE. 

 

Q: Are older versions like v10 and v9 affected?

A: These versions are not affected

 

Q: Why are some updates showing skipped during Copy to Cache?

A: These are updates for Operating Systems your CommCell does not have.  It’s more informational than error related.

 

Q: Why does the report show No Records Available or No Items to Display?

A: This means there are no affected clients in this CommCell

 

Q: What order should I apply the updates?

A: The Maintenance Release needs to be installed first, then the Hotfix Pack.  The best option is to use Copy to Cache, followed by pushing the updates out from the GUI as per the instructions.  This will ensure everything is applied as needed in the correct order.

 

Q: Can I remove versions manually?

A: No, removing anything manually will potentially cause features to not work properly.  Use the Maintenance Releases and Hotfix packs to remediate.

 

Q: Is Anti-virus a concern?

A: It is possible that an AV service may lock the affected files out of concern and cause features to not work properly.  Use the Maintenance Releases and Hotfix packs to remediate.

 

Q: How do I download Maintenance Release using CommCell Console?

A: Please follow Commvault Online Documentation steps below

https://documentation.commvault.com/11.25/expert/2705_downloading_commvault_software_using_commcell_console.html

 

Q: Is Metallic vulnerable to the vulnerability?

A: We have found that the Log4j vulnerability has no impact on Metallic or the security and privacy of your data backups. Metallic does not use the impacted libraries as per the Apache Log4j advisory.

We will continue to proactively monitor and provide any further updates, while customers with questions can reach out to Metallic.io/support.

 

Q: Log4j scanner is still picking up DbArchiveEngine.jar as potentially vulnerable?

A: Some Log4j scanners are actually incorrectly picking up DbArchiveEngine.jar as potentially vulnerable when in fact it is already patched. This is because the scanner was unable to determine the version of Log4j used and ending up marking it as “potentially vulnerable”. Please note that if you have patched Commvault clients with either the 2.16 hotfix or the latest Maintenance Release, then this DbArchiveEngine.jar binary is also patched and will not have the Log4j 0-day vulnerability. 

 

Q: I have updated to latest Maintenance Release but Log4j Affected Servers report is still showing my clients as not fixed?

A: There has been a new Log4j Affected Servers report released on December 22nd that has updated the checks to correctly report fixed for clients on the latest Maintenance Release. This new report is version 1.1.2.3 whereas the previous report is 1.1.2.2.

 

Q: How do I apply the Log4j hotfixes if I am already on the older minimum required Maintenance Release?

A: Please follow below steps:

  1. Ensure the Commserve and affected clients are on the minimum required Maintenance Release pack. 
    1. If not, please download and install using the CommCell Console 
    2. Alternatively, you may download the minimum required Maintenance Release from the links in the table below
  2. Download the Log4J-Fix pack for your version
  3. Unzip the contents of the download
  4. Run Copy To Cache and point to the folder created by the unzip to add the new updates to your software cache
  5. Push out updates to the clients
  6. Verify client status by checking the Log4j Affected Servers report or Client Details report or viewing the client properties

Log4j 2.16 fixes (CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45046)

Feature Release

Minimum Required
Maintenance Release

Update Link (includes 2.16 fix)

Installed Windows
Updates

Installed
Unix Updates

11.26

11.26.2

11.26 Log4J-2.16 Fix

1755

1755

11.25

11.25.9

11.25 Log4J-2.16 Fix

2763

2779

2763

2779

11.24

11.24.23

11.24 Log4J-2.16 Fix

4552

4564

4551

4564

11.23

11.23.37

11.23 Log4J-2.16 Fix

4160

4178

4161

4178

11.22

11.22.50

11.22 Log4J-2.16 Fix

3911

3920

3912

3920

11.21

11.21.66

11.21 Log4J-2.16 Fix

3587

3599

3588

3599

11.20

11.20.77

11.20 Log4J-2.16 Fix

4562

4574

4561

4574

SP16

SP16.128

SP16 Log4J-2.16 Fix

2943

2946

2942

2946


344 replies

Userlevel 7
Badge +19

@Laurent @Sisinfra_DGTIC this unfortunately is one of the downsides of the decision that Commvault made to reduce the amount of documented updates by not documenting the downstream hotfixes/updates in the release notes of a new maintenance release. I have not validated it myself but if you examine the hotfix numbers and you cross-reference them against the updates mentioned in the log4j article than you notice the numbers are part of the series that is covered by the maintenance release. 

So for FR24.29 the starting number is 4549 and it stops at 4570 and the specific log4j updates are numbered with Windows (4552/4564) and for Linux (4551/4564).

Userlevel 7
Badge +19

Even though Commvault states it is not affected by the latest finding in version Log4j2 2.16, I still urge Commvault to make sure 2.16 is replaced as soon as possible with Log4j2 2.17. Reason because it removes a lot of noise for many IT departments who will have to clarify towards their internal security teams, customers (think of MSPs) that Commvault is not using the specific Log4j2 function. 

 

 

Userlevel 2
Badge +4

@Mike Struening 

Hi Mike. Our CommServe and clients are running 11.22.27 . Are we affected as I only see updates for 11.22.50 ?

Cheers

Neil

 

@Nick Laflamme II sharing a screenshot someone posted a few posts back:

 

 

All three options are “enabled” by one checkbox that doesn’t refer to the other two functions????

Userlevel 7
Badge +19

@Neil Cooper yes, you will be affected!! the loose updates require 11.22.50 to be in place and yesterday Commvault released 11.22.57 which contains the fixes as part of the maintenance release. so please update your environment as soon as possible!

Userlevel 6
Badge +15

I have just downloaded the latest HP29 from my Commserve, updated the SW cache, and checked its content. I can confirm what @Onno van den Berg already stated : the log4j hotfixes are included in this one.

See below the Windows sw cache references from FR24 after the refresh (dec20/1:56PM my time) : 

:thumbsup: thanks !

Userlevel 1
Badge

Even though Commvault states it is not affected by the latest finding in version Log4j2 2.16, I still urge Commvault to make sure 2.16 is replaced as soon as possible with Log4j2 2.17. Reason because it removes a lot of noise for many IT departments who will have to clarify towards their internal security teams, customers (think of MSPs) that Commvault is not using the specific Log4j2 function.

I'm going to agree with this.

 

We support fed and dod organizations and this will be a battle to keep the solution in place with such a glaring and active vulnerability out there, regardless of cv saying they aren't affected. Coupled with the lack of clear documentation on all of the patches and documentation the impression is that this is not an important item.

 

And it's clear that dev and support don't deal with classified or government systems or consider them important.

As an FYI, the dhs directive gives wide latitude for security teams to offline and isolate affected systems without input from the system owners.

 

Maintaining and pushing cv where we can is an uphill battle on the best of days so it It would behoove cv to take the government seriously on vulnerability response.

Userlevel 2
Badge +4

@Mike Struening 

 

Do I just skip the 11.22.50 and migrate to 11.22.57 then? Do I update CommServe, then Media Agents then all other clients in that order?

Userlevel 7
Badge +19

@Mike Struening

 

Do I just skip the 11.22.50 and migrate to 11.22.57 then? Do I update CommServe, then Media Agents then all other clients in that order?

Just skip 11.22.50 and go directly to 11.22.57, and indeed update in the order as you specified!  

@Mike Struening

 

Do I just skip the 11.22.50 and migrate to 11.22.57 then? Do I update CommServe, then Media Agents then all other clients in that order?

Just skip 11.22.50 and go directly to 11.22.57, and indeed update in the order as you specified!  

<deleted due to correction.> 

Userlevel 7
Badge +19

@Nick Laflamme II please read back my comments in regards to the information that is shared in the maintenance releases. they made some changes in the way they document the fixes that are embedded in a maintenance release. you can verify it yourself by downloading 11.22.57 and see if the mentions fixes are packaged.
 

 

Userlevel 1
Badge +2

Does this latest MR remove the old binaries from Log4j v1 as well? As I am sure you know, CISA is pushing removal of these. They are EOL and have vulnerabilities of their own. 

Userlevel 2
Badge +2

@MathBob, yes I believe the updated MR release does remove the older version of Log4j from the cached locations after installing.

Badge

@Mike Struening Hi, we are on version 11.20 and ran the hotfix as per the recommendation. 

However the scan says still vulnerable, would you be able to comment on this please.

Userlevel 2
Badge +2

@Deepk Mathew , you look to be on version 11.20.77 which is the required version for 11.20 Log4J-2.16 Fix, but that version does not remove the log4j versions that are copied to cache for recovery purposes.  MR 11.20.85 is now available for download that updates and I believe removes the older binaries from cache.

Userlevel 1
Badge +2

@MathBob, yes I believe the updated MR release does remove the older version of Log4j from the cached locations after installing.

I am running 11.24.29 on a server and have observed that the old v1 versions of Log4J are still present in the cached locations. We need clarity on what this MR is supposed to do. 

Userlevel 5
Badge +11

hi @MathBob ,

 

Sticky post at the top has been updated. MR pack rolls up the Log4j 2.16 patches for easy deployment, it does not address Log4j 1.x at this time. Once Log4j 1.x update roadmap is complete, it will be announced.

 

Thank you

Badge

@Deepk Mathew , you look to be on version 11.20.77 which is the required version for 11.20 Log4J-2.16 Fix, but that version does not remove the log4j versions that are copied to cache for recovery purposes.  MR 11.20.85 is now available for download that updates and I believe removes the older binaries from cache.

We have updated from 11.20.77 to 11.20.85 and it does not appear to have removed the affected files from cache and they’re still showing up when scanned.

Userlevel 5
Badge +11

Hi @BHorner 

 

What path are you seeing the scan results come up? Can you post a screenshot or something?

 

Thank you

Badge

Hi @BHorner 

 

What path are you seeing the scan results come up? Can you post a screenshot or something?

 

Thank you

@BHorner Please see belo location which was detected on scan.


E:\Program Files\Commvault\ContentStore\Updates\SP20-HotFix-4560\GxHomeDir\Base\DbJars\DbArchiveEngine.jar contains Log4J-2.x   >= 2.0-beta9 (< 2.10.0) _VULNERABLE_ :-(
E:\Program Files\Commvault\ContentStore\Updates\SP20-HotFix-4563\GxHomeDir\Base\DbJars\DbArchiveEngine.jar contains Log4J-2.x   >= 2.15.0 _VULNERABLE_ :-(
E:\Program Files\Commvault\ContentStore\Base\DbJars\DbArchiveEngine.jar contains Log4J-2.x   >= 2.15.0 _VULNERABLE_ :-(

 

Thank you.

Badge

Hi @BHorner 

 

What path are you seeing the scan results come up? Can you post a screenshot or something?

 

Thank you

From my previous post C:\Program Files\Commvault\ContentStore\Base\DbJars\DbArchiveEngine.jar is still present on all patched servers, I can provide screenshots if needed. The updates folders were removed with the bundle but this file hasn’t been modified or removed.

Userlevel 5
Badge +11

Hi @BHorner 

 

What path are you seeing the scan results come up? Can you post a screenshot or something?

 

Thank you

From my previous post C:\Program Files\Commvault\ContentStore\Base\DbJars\DbArchiveEngine.jar is still present on all patched servers, I can provide screenshots if needed. The updates folders were removed with the bundle but this file hasn’t been modified or removed.

hi @BHorner 

 

Can you raise a support incident to review this further? I checked 11.20.85 and can see the binaries and hotfixes for DBArchiveEngine.jar are indeed present. We will need to check your system to see if updates installed properly at all.

Thank you

Badge

Hi,

 

As per the Tenable website link below it looks like log4j version 1.x is also vulnerable

CVE-2021-4104 | Tenable®️

 

Kindly can you check and update the log4j version 1.x is vulnerable or not.

Userlevel 6
Badge +15

Hi !

Well, yesterday I upgraded all my servers to fr24.hp29, which would include the hotfixes.

Today, while logging to MA, I got the alert about that, and can’t remember the details, but the ‘log4j’ report was mentionned. So I decided to have a post-hp29 upgrade view at this report, expecting to find 100% compliance.

Alas not, see below : 

 

That’s strange in at least 2 points :

  1. before updating to hp29, those 2 clients had been deployed the hp25 + the hotfixes and were reported as OK in that same report.
  2. hp29 DOES include the log4J hotfixes, so why is this reported as not applied ?

I then doubt that this report is compatible with the HP29, as it probably does not list the hotfixes included in this hotfixpack. @Onno van den Berg gave details about that, I guess it’s the same explanation (then that’s another side effect)...

Can a Vaulter confirm this ? Then I guess a new version of that report should be made available to be able to report F24hp29 as compliant/’Corrective Fix installed? =YES’)

Userlevel 7
Badge +19

@Laurent I also had a look and I can confirm you finding and also draw the conclusion that the report itself looks for the specific update versions in the database to be present along with the possibly affected client systems. This specific hotfix information was removed during the installation of the MR. But rest assured the hotfixes are really present but I think it would be smart to update the current report so it also considers the installed MR. 

Reply