@LukeBrett , can you confirm that nothing else is bound to port 80?
Hi @KEV-IT ! I went right to our SME about this for more information. What we have around Hyper-V VM folder-level compression seems to be around where the VM is stored being compressed and NOT within the VM having folders compressed. However, they can restore the VHD file out of place and attach it to the VM they plan on restoring it to in order to manually pull the files over for right now.I can confirm and get to you by EOD Thursday.Thanks!
Hi @Marco Lachance , hope all is well!I moved this to its own thread for better tracking.I’m going to check with the Product Managers for Hyperscale to confirm. I can see it came out in October, but want to assume nothing.
Funny thing is, that was the other go to fix 🤣
@xiwen , let me know if this helps:https://documentation.commvault.com/2022e/expert/147071_migrating_cloud_storage_data.html
Hi @wstbackup ! Thanks for the post.This message is informational only. It's saying that it will use recursive method during the scan phase as opposed to either scan that uses change journal.Are you seeing files not getting scanned/backed up, or just curious about the message?
Appreciate the update and good news!
Let me ask internally.Event this REST API call lacks the schedule ID:https://documentation.commvault.com/v11/essential/48754_rest_api_get_schedule_properties.htmlBe in touch!
Tagging in @Meera to confirm.
Hi @Neeraj Gautam !Can you work with your VMware Team to either consolidate the existing snapshots on these machines and run a new backup and\or manually enable Change Block Tracking prior to the next backup as described below:https://kb.vmware.com/s/article/1031873?lang=en_US&queryTerm=enable+cbtThat should resolve this issue.
@Vaibhav Waghmare , check the Streams on the Aux Copy properties. You likely have it set to combine to 1; just change that to combine to 2.
That’s a great question, @Jim Grybowski !I’m thinking there’s 2 likely places we (which I mean ‘me) can go for a possible answer here:Our training team Our Sales teamI found your sales reps and will reach out on the side for advice.They may reach out to you directly, or to me/this thread.I’ll see what I can find out for you 🤓
@Jim Grybowski , I have some resources that can discuss with you, though I want to be sure I have your contact info accurate.I’ll send you a pm.@Dave Levesque replied below as well!
Appreciate the screenshot! I noticed you also have multiplexing enable at a factor of 20.What this does is takes 20 source streams and allow them to write to each stream. Instead of 1 job going at a time, 20 will write at a time por stream.That is likely why you never see tape 2 used: you don’t have enough to go past the 20 at a time to stream 1.Note that this will make the writing phase MUCH faster since the jobs are not copied one at a time; they just write as they are ready.However, restores will be slower because the pieces of each job are not sequential.With that in mind, you can either leave it as is, or remove/reduce the multiplexing factor, 20 is awfully high.
I have absolutely loved every minute of it. Your replies have not only taught me plenty, but kept me in stitches!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.