Skip to main content
commvault.com commvault.com
Solved

Hyperscale X cluster on Vcenter with VxRail Storage nodes as target

  • September 11, 2021
  • 4 replies
  • 261 views
S
Byte
Forum|alt.badge.img+5

Hello,

 

Did any one tried out the hyperscale x nodes on vmware Vcenter with VSAN /VxRail storage nodes as target

my HCI have lot of compute and storage so though of this query is that can we virtualize hyperscale appliance/ref arch.

 

Cheers

Srikanth

Best answer by Damian Andre

@Srikanth K - The benefit of HyperScale / X is that it aggregates storage across local disks. When you virtualize, the datastores are generally backed by distributed, clustered or resilient storage already (albeit likely at a higher cost) - so there is no advantage to virtualizing it. Rather just use regular media agents.

View original
    Did this answer your question?

    4 replies

    N
    Vaulter
    Forum|alt.badge.img
    • Nick TVaulter
    • Vaulter
    • 1 reply
    • September 13, 2021

    Hi Srikanth,

    Hyperscale X nodes are not supported as virtual machines. Hyperscale X nodes are only supported on either reference architecture listed at  https://www.commvault.com/hyperscale/software or as appliance hardware as per https://www.commvault.com/hyperscale/appliance 

    Thanks

    Nick T

    Mike Struening
    MichaelCapon
    2 people like this
    • Mike Struening
      Mike Struening
    • MichaelCapon
      MichaelCapon
    S
    Byte
    Forum|alt.badge.img+5
    • Srikanth K
    • Author
    • Byte
    • 13 replies
    • September 13, 2021

    Hi Nick,

    Yes, I know that as on today we dont support hyperscale x nodes as virtual machines, do we have any plan to get that done near future.

    I am using hyperscale 1.5 appliance and ref arch based on my environment size , but I have small remote sites even entry level HS X with 60% of the resources are just idle ( I can go with Robo but in some sites we need even lesser) so planning for the next renewal like to go with hyperscale x (if it supports virtual machine ) or else just go for virtual MA.

    Thanks

    Srikanth

     

    Mike Struening
    Vaulter
    Forum|alt.badge.img+23

    Hi @Srikanth K , I checked with some internal folks and there are no plans to support Hyperscale nodes as virtual machines,

    https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-struening
    S
    1 person likes this
    • S
      Srikanth K
    Damian Andre
    Vaulter
    Forum|alt.badge.img+23
    • Damian AndreVaulter
    • Vaulter
    • 1297 replies
    • Answer
    • September 13, 2021

    @Srikanth K - The benefit of HyperScale / X is that it aggregates storage across local disks. When you virtualize, the datastores are generally backed by distributed, clustered or resilient storage already (albeit likely at a higher cost) - so there is no advantage to virtualizing it. Rather just use regular media agents.

    Mike Struening
    1 person likes this
    • Mike Struening
      Mike Struening

    Reply


    Most helpful members this week

    Terms & ConditionsCookie settings

    Cookie policy

    We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

     
    Cookie settings