Hey @commvault11 !
Hyperscale X is a different architecture altogether.
I would suggest checking out this link below as the differences are quite numerous. It’s not just a simple ‘newer version’. The underlying architecture is totally different.
If you have any specific questions, post them here and I’ll get answers for you
https://www.commvault.com/hyperscale
Hi @Mike Struening
We have acquired Commvault Complete Backup & Recovery with Commvault HyperScale Software with Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s DL 380 storage. (Node Type N12) What version of Hyperscale Reference Architecture is best to take if we don't want to use the cloud, but use secondary site to replication data by the compression and deduplication. Version 1.5 or 2.1 and do you have a link below as the difference with these 2 versions. Thank you very much for your help!
I don’t have a feature per feature document, though if you check our docs, you can see what one has vs. the other:
HSX:
https://documentation.commvault.com/commvault/v11/article?p=132491_1.htm
HS 1.5:
https://documentation.commvault.com/commvault/v11/article?p=133025.htm
The main difference is that 1.5 uses Gluster as its underlying structure and HSX uses Hedvig, though there are more features as well.
I would suggest reaching out to your Account Rep who can best guide you (I’ve taken the liberty to reach out to them on your behalf).