I ran the “Subclients without Secondary Copies” report and there are several records that are there. It appears in only 2 cases that a subclient was not associated with any aux/secondary copies, and in several more cases there are associations in secondary copies that are still “there” but for delicensed clients.
Also: It appears it is occurring with clients/subclients tied to just *one* of my storage policies. All other clients/subclients associated with all my other storage policies look “ok” (and are not showing up on this report).
I was under the impression that once you associated a client to a storage policy, the “association” of the client to the secondary copies happened automatically. And when you delicensed a client, the associations were automatically removed. Is this true/supposed to happen always or are there caveats to these assumptions?
I’m feeling there is a config or something ‘special” about this single storage policy (it is very old) but I don’t know what it would be that would cause storage policy secondary copy “associations” to not be auto added or removed whenever new clients are added or licenses released.
