Skip to main content
Solved

Media Agents can be physical or virtual?

  • September 14, 2023
  • 3 replies
  • 895 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+6

Dumb Question, but  I don't want to have to have my systems team argle bargle. Media Agents have to be physical servers, correct? I am assuming there shouldn't be a reason why it cannot be a virtual machine, but before I put my foot in my mouth (tasty btw) I want to see what the community best practice is. 

Best answer by Javier

Media Agents can be indeed hosted by a Virtual Machine, as long as they meet the hardware requirements.

Media Agents are pretty resource intensive, specially in regards to their DDBs and how sensitive they are to latency and delays (Q&I Times), that may be the reason why MAs are preferred to be hosted in Physical Machines.

I cannot see anything wrong with hosting a Media Agent as a VM and having pass-through disk for DDBs and Libraries (if they are local disk to the MA). Just keep in mind VM resources will be shared among all the VMs within the hypervisor, we need to ensure hardware requirements are meet at all times.

View original
Did this answer your question?

3 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+7
  • Vaulter
  • 90 replies
  • September 15, 2023

Hi @TP_Erickson ,

 

Good day.

While configuring the Media Agent, the main components are DDB and Index, So I would like you to refer to the below documents and accordingly configure the Media Agent.

 

https://documentation.commvault.com/v11/expert/111985_hardware_specifications_for_deduplication_mode.html

https://documentation.commvault.com/v11/expert/1656_hardware_specifications_for_non_deduplication_mode.html

https://documentation.commvault.com/v11/expert/2822_mediaagent_system_requirements.html

 

Regards,

Wasim


Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Vaulter
  • 248 replies
  • Answer
  • September 15, 2023

Media Agents can be indeed hosted by a Virtual Machine, as long as they meet the hardware requirements.

Media Agents are pretty resource intensive, specially in regards to their DDBs and how sensitive they are to latency and delays (Q&I Times), that may be the reason why MAs are preferred to be hosted in Physical Machines.

I cannot see anything wrong with hosting a Media Agent as a VM and having pass-through disk for DDBs and Libraries (if they are local disk to the MA). Just keep in mind VM resources will be shared among all the VMs within the hypervisor, we need to ensure hardware requirements are meet at all times.


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Bit
  • 3 replies
  • September 20, 2023

We have Hyperscale's and Virtual servers as MA’s. And planning to migrate off Hyperscale to Virtual as MA solution


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings