I’m a little confused about Back-end Size for Disk Storage in our MAs.
Back-end Size for Disk Storage
| Extra large | Extra large | Large | Large | Medium | Medium | Small | Extra small | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grid 9 10 | 1 DDB location per node | 2 DDB locations per node | 1 DDB location per node | 2 DDB locations per node | 1 DDB location per node | 2 DDB locations per node | 1 DDB location per node | 1 DDB location per node |
| 1 Node | Up to 250 TB | Up to 500 TB | Up to 150 TB | Up to 300 TB | Up to 75 TB | Up to 150 TB | Up to 50 TB | Up to 25 TB |
| 2 Node | Up to 500 TB | Up to 1000 TB | Up to 300 TB | Up to 600 TB | Up to 150 TB | Up to 300 TB | Up to 100 TB | Up to 50 TB |
| 3 Node | Up to 750 TB | Up to 1500 TB | Up to 450 TB | Up to 900 TB | Up to 225 TB | Up to 450 TB | ||
| 4 Node | Up to 1000 TB | Up to 2000 TB | Up to 600 TB | Up to 1200 TB | Up to 300 TB | Up to 600 TB |
We are planning to deploy 2000TB for each 2 physical Node MAs. By my undertanding, using 2 DBBs in 2 Nodes, the maximum would be 1000 TB.
My question: This is a point of failure and can limit the writing or anything else?
Thanks (first post).
